---
title: "Explicit Data Flow"
description: "If a function produces a result, return it. Never rely on mutation of an input parameter to communicate output. Data should flow explicitly through return values so the reader can trace where each value comes from. When a function mutates its input, the data flow is hidden -- you cannot tell from the call site what changed or whether other references were affected. With explicit returns and `const"
type: skill
canonical_url: https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com/skills/explicit-data-flow
source: "Claudary"
difficulty: intermediate
author: "Claude Code Knowledge Pack"
date: 2026-07-10T11:24:27.796Z
license: CC-BY-4.0
attribution: "Explicit Data Flow — Claudary (https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com/skills/explicit-data-flow)"
---

# Explicit Data Flow
If a function produces a result, return it. Never rely on mutation of an input parameter to communicate output. Data should flow explicitly through return values so the reader can trace where each value comes from. When a function mutates its input, the data flow is hidden -- you cannot tell from the call site what changed or whether other references were affected. With explicit returns and `const

## Overview

---
title: Explicit Data Flow
paths:
  - "src/**/*"
impact: HIGH
---

# Explicit Data Flow

If a function produces a result, return it. Never rely on mutation of an input parameter to communicate output. Data should flow explicitly through return values so the reader can trace where each value comes from. When a function mutates its input, the data flow is hidden -- you cannot tell from the call site what changed or whether other references were affected. With explicit returns and `const`, the call site becomes self-documenting: assignments show data origin, and immutability guarantees no downstream code silently altered what you are reading. Prefer pure expressions that produce new values over procedures that modify existing ones.

## Incorrect

Mutation of the input hides where data ends up. The call site looks like a standalone command, but the caller depends on the side effect for its result.

```typescript
const result = {}
if(featureEnabled)
  applyNewFeature(result)  // mutates result in-place
```

Using `let` and reassignment is still unclear because the reader cannot tell whether `applyNewFeature` also mutates the original in addition to returning a value.

```typescript
let result = {}
if(featureEnabled)
  result = applyNewFeature(result)  // unclear whether applyNewFeature also mutates
```

## Correct

A pure expression with `const` makes data flow visible in one line. The reader sees exactly what `result` is bound to, with no hidden mutation.

```typescript
const result = featureEnabled ? applyNewFeature(baseData) : {}
```

## Reference

- [Referential Transparency](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referential_transparency)
- [Immutability and Pure Functions](https://mostly-adequate.gitbook.io/mostly-adequate-guide/ch03)

---

Source: [Claudary](https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com/skills/explicit-data-flow) · https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com