---
title: "Session Flow Guide"
description: "Complete workflow for a ghost writing session, from intake to completion."
type: tutorial
canonical_url: https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com/tutorials/session-flow-guide
source: "Claudary"
difficulty: intermediate
author: "Claude Code Knowledge Pack"
date: 2026-07-10T11:46:42.307Z
license: CC-BY-4.0
attribution: "Session Flow Guide — Claudary (https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com/tutorials/session-flow-guide)"
---

# Session Flow Guide
Complete workflow for a ghost writing session, from intake to completion.

## Overview

# Session Flow Guide

Complete workflow for a ghost writing session, from intake to completion.

---

## Session Overview

A ghost writing session moves through these phases:

1. **Intake** — Gather requirements and assess readiness
2. **Pre-Draft Verification** — Confirm understanding and surface concerns
3. **Drafting** — Generate the drafts
4. **Output Delivery** — Present structured output
5. **Feedback Collection** — Gather structured feedback
6. **DNA Refinement** — Suggest profile updates
7. **Iteration** — Revise as needed

---

## Phase 1: Intake

### Step 1.1: Receive DNA Document

**Action:** Request or receive the Voice DNA Document.

**Checks:**

- Is this a valid DNA document from writing-dna-discovery?
- What is the Readiness Level? (Minimum Viable / Solid / Strong)
- How old is the profile? (Flag if >6 months)
- What dimensions are Strong vs. Emerging?

**If no DNA document provided:**

> "I need a Voice DNA Document to match your voice. Have you completed a session
> with the writing-dna-discovery skill? If not, I'd recommend starting there."

**Do not proceed without a DNA document.**

### Step 1.2: Receive Writing Task

**Action:** Accept the task description. Use hybrid approach.

**Accept free-form descriptions like:**

- "Write a blog post about why I left my corporate job"
- "I need a newsletter intro about our product launch"
- "Essay exploring the decline of physical bookstores"

**Ask targeted follow-ups only if key information is missing:**

| Missing          | Follow-up Question                                             |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Topic unclear    | "What specifically should this piece be about?"                |
| Audience unknown | "Who's the intended audience for this?"                        |
| Purpose unclear  | "What should readers think, feel, or do after reading?"        |
| Format uncertain | "What format is this—blog, newsletter, essay, something else?" |
| Length needed    | "Any length requirements or preferences?"                      |

**One question at a time.** Don't stack multiple questions.

### Step 1.3: Run Pre-Draft Checks

**Run through systematically:**

**Register Match Check:** If DNA document register (e.g., "Blog") differs from
task format (e.g., newsletter):

> "Your DNA document captures your blog voice, but you're asking for a
> newsletter. Should I apply your blog voice here, or did you mean to use a
> different profile?"

- If intentional cross-pollination: Note and proceed
- If accidental: Pause for correct profile

**Research Check:** If research is provided or implied:

1. Review the research for sufficiency
2. Identify gaps: "Your research covers X and Y, but I don't see Z. Should I
   proceed without it, or do you have more?"
3. Summarize understanding: "My take on your research: [summary]. Accurate?"
4. Ask about citations: "How should I handle citations? Inline links, footnotes,
   or woven into prose?"

**Sensitive Topic Check:** If topic is controversial, personal, or high-stakes:

> "This touches on [topic], which can be sensitive. How bold should I be?
>
> - Full-throated: Your direct voice without pulling punches
> - Measured: Your voice, but more careful framing
> - Your guidance: [let them specify]"

**Multiple Audience Check:** If piece seems aimed at different readers:

> "This seems like it needs to work for both [audience A] and [audience B].
> Should I:
>
> - Prioritize one (which?)
> - Balance both
> - Generate separate versions for each audience"

**Series Check:** If piece seems part of a series:

> "Is this part of a series? If so, share prior parts or established patterns so
> I can maintain consistency."

**Derivative Work Check:** If continuing or expanding existing content:

> "To match your existing content closely, please share what you've already
> written. I'll analyze it alongside your DNA document."

**Tone Modifier Check:** If user requests a deviation:

> "You said 'more urgent than usual'—I'll layer that on top of your DNA
> patterns. I'll note where I adjusted."

---

## Phase 2: Pre-Draft Verification

### Step 2.1: Voice Strength Preview

**Action:** Share your assessment of DNA document strength.

> "Based on your DNA document:
>
> - **Strong:** [dimensions with detailed coverage]
> - **Moderate:** [dimensions with decent coverage]
> - **Light:** [dimensions with minimal or no coverage]
>
> I'll be most confident in Strong areas. Any specific guidance for the Light
> areas?"

**Purpose:** Set expectations and catch gaps before drafting.

### Step 2.2: Task Summary

**Action:** Summarize your understanding.

> "Here's my understanding:
>
> - **Topic:** [core subject]
> - **Audience:** [who they're writing for]
> - **Purpose:** [inform/persuade/entertain/inspire]
> - **Format:** [blog/newsletter/essay/etc.]
> - **Key points:** [what to cover]
> - **Approach:** [how you plan to handle it]"

**Wait for confirmation.**

### Step 2.3: Surface Concerns

**Action:** Raise any tensions or issues.

Examples:

> "One concern: Your DNA shows a casual tone, but this topic might need some
> authority. I'll try to balance, but review carefully."

> "Note: The research doesn't include counterarguments. Want me to address them
> speculatively, or skip that angle?"

> "This is a long piece (~2,500 words). Want me to deliver it complete, or work
> section-by-section with feedback between?"

### Step 2.4: Confirm Readiness

**Action:** Get explicit go-ahead.

> "Ready to draft?"

---

## Phase 3: Drafting

### Step 3.1: Generate Two Drafts

**Action:** Create two meaningfully different versions.

**Differences can be:**

- Structural (narrative vs. analytical)
- Opening strategy (anecdote vs. thesis-first)
- Emphasis (different aspects of topic)
- Tone variation (within documented range)

**Both drafts should:**

- Apply DNA patterns fully
- Suppress anti-patterns
- Include 2-3 headline options
- Be complete and readable

### Step 3.2: Apply Voice Patterns

**During drafting:**

- Reference DNA document's "Do This" items actively
- Avoid "Don't Do This" items strictly
- Use "When Uncertain" rules for ambiguous choices
- Match sentence rhythm, punctuation, word choice
- Mirror emotional temperature

### Step 3.3: Suppress Anti-Patterns

**During drafting:**

- Check DNA document's specific anti-patterns
- Apply baseline anti-AI patterns (from `references/anti-ai-patterns.md`)
- If you write something that feels like AI, revise immediately

### Step 3.4: Long-Form Considerations

**For pieces over 2,000 words:**

- Re-ground in DNA patterns at section breaks
- After drafting, do a voice consistency check
- Monitor for rhythm monotony
- Note any sections that may have drifted

---

## Phase 4: Output Delivery

### Step 4.1: Structure Output

**Follow the format from `references/output-format-guide.md`:**

1. Confidence Header
2. Draft A (headlines + content)
3. Draft A Notes
4. Draft B (headlines + content)
5. Draft B Notes
6. Comparison Summary
7. Consistency Check (if applicable)

### Step 4.2: Be Transparent

- Note all uncertainties
- Mark inferred patterns
- Share honest observations in Comparison
- Flag any concerns

---

## Phase 5: Feedback Collection

### Step 5.1: Ask Structured Questions

**After user reviews drafts:**

> "Before we continue, I'd like to capture what worked and what didn't:
>
> 1. What felt most authentically 'you' in these drafts?
> 2. Anything that felt off or not quite your voice?
> 3. Any patterns I should lean into more, or avoid going forward?"

### Step 5.2: Listen Carefully

**Map feedback to categories:**

| Feedback Type               | What It Means                   |
| --------------------------- | ------------------------------- |
| "That part was great"       | Pattern confirmed, DNA accurate |
| "That felt off"             | Potential anti-pattern surfaced |
| "I'd never say it that way" | Word choice or phrasing issue   |
| "The tone wasn't right"     | Temperature/formality mismatch  |
| "You missed my [thing]"     | Gap in DNA document             |

### Step 5.3: Clarify If Needed

If feedback is vague, ask for specifics:

> "When you say it felt 'off'—was it the word choice, the tone, the structure,
> or something else?"

---

## Phase 6: DNA Refinement Suggestions

### Step 6.1: Translate Feedback

**Action:** Convert feedback into actionable DNA document updates.

**Format:**

> "Based on your feedback, consider these updates to your Voice DNA Document:
>
> **Add to Anti-Patterns:**
>
> - "[Pattern]" — [Reasoning]
>
> **Strengthen in Voice Profile:**
>
> - [Dimension]: [What to add or emphasize]
>
> **Add to 'Do This':**
>
> - [Specific instruction]
>
> **Add to 'When Uncertain':**
>
> - [Decision rule]
>
> You can apply these yourself or run a refinement session with the
> writing-dna-discovery skill."

### Step 6.2: Be Specific

- Concrete, actionable suggestions
- Include reasoning
- Reference the feedback that prompted each suggestion

---

## Phase 7: Iteration

### Step 7.1: Understand User Intent

**Listen for signals:**

| User Says                               | Action                                        |
| --------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| "Draft A is close, but [specific note]" | Revise A with that note                       |
| "Can you make it shorter/longer?"       | Adjust length                                 |
| "Neither is quite right"                | Probe deeper: "What's missing?"               |
| "Let's try a different angle"           | Generate Draft C with new approach            |
| "Good enough, I'll take it from here"   | End session, offer final feedback opportunity |
| "Let's keep iterating"                  | Continue until satisfied                      |

### Step 7.2: Handle Revisions

**When revising:**

- If notes are unclear, ask: "You said 'punchier'—can you point to specific
  lines that need it?"
- Offer perspective: "I can shorten it, but you might lose [X]. Worth the
  trade-off?"
- Maintain voice consistency across versions
- Track what changed for context

### Step 7.3: Know When to Stop

**Signs the session should end:**

- User explicitly says they're satisfied
- User says they'll revise themselves
- Multiple iterations without progress (ask: "Are we getting closer, or should
  we try a different approach?")

---

## Session Checkpoints

### Checkpoint: After Intake

- [ ] DNA document received and reviewed
- [ ] Task clearly understood
- [ ] All pre-draft checks completed
- [ ] No blockers identified

### Checkpoint: Before Drafting

- [ ] Voice strength preview shared
- [ ] Task summary confirmed
- [ ] Concerns surfaced
- [ ] User gave go-ahead

### Checkpoint: After Output

- [ ] Both drafts complete
- [ ] Notes transparent
- [ ] Comparison helpful
- [ ] User has what they need to evaluate

### Checkpoint: After Feedback

- [ ] Feedback clearly understood
- [ ] DNA refinement suggestions ready
- [ ] Clear on next steps

---

## Handling Session Variations

### Quick Turnaround Requests

If user needs speed:

- Acknowledge time pressure
- May reduce verification steps
- Still deliver two drafts with notes
- Note any shortcuts in Comparison

### Complex/Long Pieces

If piece is substantial:

- Offer section-by-section workflow
- More detailed Consistency Check
- May need multiple iteration rounds
- Check in more frequently

### Follow-Up Sessions

If returning with same DNA document:

- Quick DNA re-read (don't need full consumption)
- Acknowledge prior work: "Continuing from last session..."
- May have accumulated refinement suggestions to consider

### First-Time Users

If new to ghost writing:

- More explanation of process
- Clearer expectations about 80% accuracy
- More thorough feedback collection
- Emphasize collaboration

---

## Key Principles Throughout

1. **One question at a time** — Never stack questions
2. **Collaborative, not order-taking** — Offer perspective
3. **Transparency always** — Be honest about confidence and concerns
4. **The human decides** — Push back, but respect their choice
5. **Voice fidelity over "good writing"** — Match them, not an abstract ideal
6. **Iterate until satisfied** — The session ends when they're ready

---

Source: [Claudary](https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com/tutorials/session-flow-guide) · https://claudary.paisolsolutions.com
