Principles
Aggregation pipelines process documents through sequential stages. Focus on:
Overview
Principles
Aggregation pipelines process documents through sequential stages. Focus on:
- Reducing documents early in the pipeline
- Minimizing data moved between stages
- Leveraging indexes where possible
- Managing memory usage
Memory limits and disk spilling
Blocking stages (such as in-memory $sort and $group) have a 100MB memory limit per stage. Default behavior when this limit is exceeded is to spill to disk automatically (allowDiskUse defaults to true).
Better solutions:
- Filter more aggressively early in pipeline
- Add indexes to enable
$sortto use index order - Use
$limitwith$sortto reduce the amount of data the sort must process in memory for unindexed sorts - Consider materialized views for repeated aggregations
Optimization Examples
These examples are not exhaustive but representative of some common optimization patterns.
Unindexed $lookup vs. Indexed $lookup
Bad — No index on the foreign collection's join field:
db.orders.aggregate([
{ $lookup: {
from: "products",
localField: "productId",
foreignField: "sku", // no index on products.sku!
as: "product"
}}
])
Good — Index on foreignField in the foreign collection:
db.products.createIndex({ sku: 1 })
db.orders.aggregate([
{ $lookup: {
from: "products",
localField: "productId",
foreignField: "sku",
as: "product"
}}
])
Why: Each $lookup executes a find on the from collection. Without an index on foreignField, every join does a full collection scan. This is the single most critical $lookup optimization.
Early $project Defeating Optimization vs. Late $project
Bad — Early $project prevents the optimizer from pruning unused fields, forgets to exclude _id which is unneeded, and includes name which is not used:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $project: { name: 1, status: 1, amount: 1 } },
{ $match: { status: "active" } },
{ $group: { _id: "$status", total: { $sum: "$amount" } } }
])
Good — Let the optimizer handle field pruning; use $project only at the end for reshaping:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $match: { status: "active" } },
{ $group: { _id: "$status", total: { $sum: "$amount" } } },
{ $project: { _id: 0, status: "$_id", total: 1 } } // reshape at the end
])
Why: MongoDB's pipeline optimizer automatically analyzes which fields are used and avoids fetching unused ones. An early $project defeats this optimization, and can inadvertently request the wrong fields.
$facet for Divergent Processing vs. $unionWith
Bad — $facet sends all documents to every branch, even if branches need very different subsets:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $facet: {
"top10": [{ $sort: { score: -1 } }, { $limit: 10 }],
"totalCount": [{ $count: "n" }] // gets ALL docs even though it's just counting
}}
])
Good — Separate pipelines via $unionWith let each branch optimize independently:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $sort: { score: -1 } }, { $limit: 10 },
{ $unionWith: {
coll: "collection",
pipeline: [{ $count: "n" }]
}}
])
Why: $facet funnels every document into every branch. $unionWith runs independent pipelines that each benefit from their own index usage and optimization.
$sort \+ $limit as Separate Concerns vs. Top-N Sort
Bad — Large sort, then limit (MongoDB may sort entire dataset):
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $group: { _id: "$category", total: { $sum: "$amount" } } },
{ $sort: { total: -1 } },
// ... many stages later ...
{ $limit: 10 }
])
Good — Place $limit immediately after $sort:
db.collection.aggregate([
{ $group: { _id: "$category", total: { $sum: "$amount" } } },
{ $sort: { total: -1 } },
{ $limit: 10 }
])
Why: When $sort is immediately followed by $limit, MongoDB performs a top-N sort — it only tracks the top N values instead of sorting the full dataset. Far less memory.
$unwind Best Practices
When $unwind is needed, filter before unwinding so that the $match stage allows index usage:
[
{ $match: { "items.category": "electronics" } }, // Reduce documents first
{ $unwind: "$items" }, // Then unwind
{ $match: { "items.category": "electronics" } } // Filter unwound elements
]
Never $unwind to re-group by _id: If you are using $unwind followed by $group with _id: you can replace it with an array operator like $filter, $map or $reduce to match or transform array elements without unwinding.
Optimize $lookup operations
$lookup performs collection joins and can be expensive. Strategies to improve performance:
- Filter before lookup to reduce left-side documents
- Use indexed fields in the lookup
localField/foreignField - Add $match in the lookup pipeline to reduce right-side documents early
- Add $project last in the lookup pipeline to keep only the fields you need
- $unwind immediately after lookup when you need
asresult flattened
[
{ $match: { active: true } }, // Reduce left side
{ $lookup: {
from: "inventory",
localField: "product_id",
foreignField: "_id", // _id is always indexed
pipeline: [
{ $match: { inStock: true } }, // Reduce right side
{ $project: { _id: 0, name: 1, price: 1 } }
],
as: "product"
}},
{ $unwind: "$product" }
]
Schema consideration: Excessive $lookup usage may indicate over-normalization. Consider embedding frequently-joined data.
$group efficiency
Group operations require accumulating result documents in memory. Keys to efficiency:
- Include only needed fields within the $group stage \- reference only the fields you need in accumulators
- Be mindful of unbounded accumulators \-
$pushand$addToSetgrow as group size increases and can cause memory issues
Bad \- do not add $project before $group to "reduce fields":
[
{ $match: { date: { $gte: ISODate("2024-01-01") } } },
{ $project: { category: 1, amount: 1 } },
{ $group: {
_id: "$category",
total: { $sum: "$amount" },
count: { $sum: 1 }
}}
]
Good \- reference only needed fields directly in $group:
[
{ $match: { date: { $gte: ISODate("2024-01-01") } } },
{ $group: {
_id: "$category",
total: { $sum: "$amount" },
count: { $sum: 1 }
}}
]
Why: The $group stage only processes the fields referenced in its expressions. Adding a $project before it does not save memory.