All skills
Skillintermediate
/cause-and-effect - Fishbone Analysis
Systematic exploration of problem causes across six categories using the Ishikawa (Fishbone) diagram approach.
Claude Code Knowledge Pack7/10/2026
Overview
/cause-and-effect - Fishbone Analysis
Systematic exploration of problem causes across six categories using the Ishikawa (Fishbone) diagram approach.
- Purpose - Comprehensive multi-factor root cause exploration
- Output - Structured analysis across People, Process, Technology, Environment, Methods, and Materials
/cause-and-effect ["problem description"]
Arguments
Optional problem description to analyze. If not provided, you will be prompted for input.
How It Works
- State the Problem: Define the "head" of the fish - the effect you're analyzing
- Explore Each Category: Brainstorm potential causes in six domains:
- People: Skills, training, communication, team dynamics
- Process: Workflows, procedures, standards, reviews
- Technology: Tools, infrastructure, dependencies, configuration
- Environment: Workspace, deployment targets, external factors
- Methods: Approaches, patterns, architectures, practices
- Materials: Data, dependencies, third-party services, resources
- Dig Deeper: For each potential cause, ask "why" to uncover deeper issues
- Identify Root Causes: Distinguish contributing factors from fundamental causes
- Prioritize: Rank causes by impact and likelihood
- Propose Solutions: Address highest-priority root causes
Usage Examples
# Analyze performance issues
> /cause-and-effect "API responses take 3+ seconds"
# Investigate test reliability
> /cause-and-effect "15% of test runs fail, passing on retry"
# Understand delivery delays
> /cause-and-effect "Feature took 12 weeks instead of 3"
Example Output
Problem: API responses take 3+ seconds (target: <500ms)
PEOPLE
├─ Team unfamiliar with performance optimization
├─ No one owns performance monitoring
└─ Frontend team doesn't understand backend constraints
PROCESS
├─ No performance testing in CI/CD
├─ No SLA defined for response times
└─ Performance regression not caught in code review
TECHNOLOGY
├─ Database queries not optimized
│ └─ Why: No query analysis tools in place
├─ N+1 queries in ORM
│ └─ Why: Eager loading not configured
└─ No caching layer
ROOT CAUSES:
- No performance requirements defined (Process)
- Missing performance monitoring tooling (Technology)
- Architecture doesn't support caching/async (Methods)
SOLUTIONS (Priority Order):
1. Add database indexes (quick win, high impact)
2. Implement Redis caching layer (medium effort, high impact)
3. Define and monitor performance SLAs (low effort, prevents regression)
Best practices
- Do not stop at first cause - Explore deeply within each category
- Look for cross-category connections - Some causes span multiple domains
- Root causes usually involve process or methods - Not just technology
- Combine with /why - Use Five Whys to dig deeper on specific causes
- Prioritize by impact x feasibility / effort - Focus on highest-value fixes