Generate Implementation Plan
**Overview Document:** $ARGUMENTS
Overview
Generate Implementation Plan
Overview Document: $ARGUMENTS
Phase 0: Context Retrieval
-
Fetch the overview document from parent:
{Overview_Document} -
Extract from document:
{Epic_Key}- The epic ticket key (e.g., MA-123){Jira_Project}- Link to the Jira project/board- Related ticket links
-
FAILURE CONDITION - Missing Information:
If epic key or project cannot be determined:
STOP and prompt the user:
I was unable to extract required information from the overview document. Found: [list what was found] Please provide: 1. Epic Key: [e.g., MA-123] 2. Jira Project URL: [paste link]DO NOT PROCEED until confirmed.
-
MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Document Confirmation:
Please confirm the following before I proceed: Overview Document: {Overview_Document} Epic Key: {Epic_Key} Jira Project: {Jira_Project} Is this correct? (Yes / No / Correct)DO NOT PROCEED without explicit user confirmation.
Phase 1: Discovery
- Read the overview document for epic context, scope, and risk assessments
- Read all Jira tickets linked to this epic for detailed requirements
- Explore the codebase to understand:
- File structure and naming conventions
- Similar existing implementations to reference
- Test patterns and fixtures available
- API patterns and data models
Phase 2: Ticket Refinement
Analyze existing tickets and prepare adjustments (see Ticket Management below).
MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Proposed Ticket Changes:
Before making ANY ticket changes, present to user:
## Proposed Ticket Changes for {Epic_Key}
### New Tickets to Create
| Title | Description | Points | Justification |
|-------|-------------|--------|---------------|
| [title] | [brief desc] | [pts] | [why needed] |
### Tickets to Split
| Original | New Tickets | Reason |
|----------|-------------|--------|
| [KEY] | [list new] | [why split] |
### Story Point Updates
| Ticket | Current | Proposed | Reason |
|--------|---------|----------|--------|
| [KEY] | [old] | [new] | [justification] |
### Dependencies to Add
| Ticket | Blocked By | Reason |
|--------|------------|--------|
| [KEY] | [blocker] | [why] |
Proceed with these changes? (Yes / No / Modify)
- Yes → Make the changes and continue
- No → Skip ticket changes, proceed to Phase 3
- Modify → User provides adjustments, re-confirm
DO NOT modify any Jira tickets without explicit approval.
Phase 3: Implementation Plan
Generate a detailed, agent-executable implementation plan (see structure below).
MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Plan Review:
Before publishing, present the complete implementation plan to the user:
## Implementation Plan Preview for {Epic_Key}
[Full implementation plan content]
---
Review the plan above. Proceed to publish? (Yes / No / Modify)
- Yes → Continue to Phase 4
- No → Discard and ask what changes are needed
- Modify → User provides feedback, regenerate and re-confirm
DO NOT PROCEED to publishing without explicit approval.
Phase 4: Publish
-
MANDATORY CHECKPOINT - Parent Document Updates:
Before updating the parent planning document, present proposed changes:
## Proposed Updates to Overview Document I will add the following "Adjustments Section" to {Overview_Document}: [Show exact content to be added] Proceed with update? (Yes / No / Modify)DO NOT UPDATE the parent document without explicit approval.
-
Publish the implementation plan as a Confluence subpage (
{Implementation_Plan}) -
Update all tickets with Implementation Plan link:
- After publishing,
{Implementation_Plan}URL is now known - Update ALL epic tickets to replace placeholder with actual URL:
Overview Document: {Overview_Document} Implementation Plan: {Implementation_Plan} - This ensures
/execute-ticketcan extract both links from any ticket
- After publishing,
-
Update the parent planning document with approved adjustments
Ticket Management
Before creating the implementation plan, analyze the existing tickets and adjust as needed.
Ticket Description Format (MANDATORY)
ALL tickets (new and existing) MUST have these links at the TOP of their description:
Overview Document: {Overview_Document}
Implementation Plan: {Implementation_Plan}
---
[Rest of ticket description]
- New tickets: Add this header when creating
- Existing tickets: Update description to add this header if missing
{Implementation_Plan}will be the URL of the subpage created in Phase 4
Note: Since the Implementation Plan doesn't exist yet during Phase 2, use a placeholder:
Implementation Plan: [To be added after plan is published]
Then update all tickets with the actual URL after Phase 4 publishing.
Create New Tickets
- Identify gaps in coverage (missing functionality, edge cases, setup tasks)
- Create tickets for discovered technical dependencies
- Add tickets for required refactoring or tech debt that blocks implementation
Split Large Tickets
- Any ticket estimated at >8 story points should be split
- Each ticket should represent a single, deliverable unit of work
Add Story Points
Estimate and add story points to ALL tickets (new and existing):
| Points | Complexity | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Simple, isolated change | Fix typo, update config, add simple validation |
| 3-5 | Moderate, few files | New API endpoint, component with tests |
| 8 | Complex, multiple components | Feature spanning frontend + backend |
| 13+ | Too large - must be split | Epic-level work |
Link Dependencies
- Set "blocked by" relationships in Jira for all dependencies
- Ensure no circular dependencies exist
Implementation Plan Structure
Summary Section
- Total number of tasks (including any new tickets created)
- Overall complexity assessment (Low/Medium/High based on risk scores)
- Total story points
- Key dependencies overview
- Suggested execution order
Task Breakdown
For each Jira ticket, create a task entry with:
Task Header
- Ticket key and title (e.g., "MA-124 - Add user authentication")
- Link to the Jira ticket
- Story points
- Risk level from the planning doc (Low/Medium/High)
- Dependencies (list any tickets that must be completed first)
Implementation Steps
Provide detailed, agent-executable steps including:
- Specific file paths to create or modify
- Code patterns to follow (reference existing codebase patterns)
- API endpoints to implement
- Database changes if any
- Configuration updates needed
- Follow existing conventions for naming, file structure, and architecture
Each step should be concrete enough that an AI coding agent can execute it directly without additional context.
Files to Modify
List all files that will be touched:
path/to/file.ts- Brief description of changes
Tests to Write
Specify exactly what tests are needed:
- Unit tests: List specific functions/components to test
- Integration tests: List API endpoints or service interactions to test
- E2E tests: List user flows to test (if applicable)
Acceptance Criteria
Each task is complete when:
- All implementation steps are done
- Pre-commit hooks pass (linting, formatting, type checks)
- Pre-push hooks pass (tests, build)
- Unit tests written and passing
- Integration tests written and passing (if applicable)
- E2E tests written and passing (if applicable)
- 90% branch coverage maintained
- All existing tests continue to pass
- Code reviewed and approved
- Jira ticket acceptance criteria met
Execution Order
Provide a topologically sorted list of tasks based on dependencies:
- Task A (no dependencies) - X points
- Task B (depends on A) - X points
- Task C (depends on A) - X points
- Task D (depends on B, C) - X points
Parallel Execution Strategy
Identify tickets that can be worked on simultaneously by independent agents:
Parallel Execution Waves
Group tickets into waves where all tickets in a wave can be executed concurrently:
Wave 1 (no dependencies - execute in parallel):
- TICKET-101: [title] (3 pts) → frontend-developer
- TICKET-102: [title] (5 pts) → backend-developer
- TICKET-103: [title] (2 pts) → test-automator
Wave 2 (depends on Wave 1 - execute in parallel after Wave 1):
- TICKET-104: [title] (5 pts) → fullstack-developer
- TICKET-105: [title] (3 pts) → frontend-developer
Wave 3 (depends on Wave 2):
- TICKET-106: [title] (8 pts) → fullstack-developer
Agent Specialization Recommendations
For each ticket, recommend the optimal agent type based on the work involved:
| Work Type | Recommended Agent |
|---|---|
| Frontend UI/components | frontend-developer |
| API/backend services | backend-developer |
| Database changes | database-optimizer |
| Full-stack features | fullstack-developer |
| Test coverage | test-automator |
| Security-sensitive | security-auditor |
| Performance-critical | performance-engineer |
Coordination Notes
- Tickets in the same wave have no dependencies on each other
- Wave N+1 tickets depend on one or more Wave N tickets
- Independent agents can work simultaneously within each wave
- Synchronize and verify completion before starting next wave
Parent Document Updates
After completing the implementation plan, update the original Confluence planning, {Overview_Document},document with:
Adjustments Section (add to planning doc)
- Tickets Added: List any new tickets created with justification
- Tickets Split: List any tickets that were split and why
- Scope Changes: Document any scope adjustments discovered
- New Risks: Add any new risks discovered during implementation planning
- Revised Dependencies: Update dependency graph if changed
- Updated Estimates: Revised total effort based on story points
Output Location
Publish the implementation plan to Confluence as a subpage:
- Parent page:
{Overview_Document} - Subpage title: "{Epic_Key} Implementation Plan"
If the subpage already exists, update it. If you cannot create subpages, ask the user for an alternative location.
Also update the parent planning document at {Overview_Document} with the "Adjustments Section" content.
Output
When complete, provide:
- Implementation Plan URL (new subpage) - needed for ticket execution
- Updated Overview Document URL (parent page)
- Summary of changes made - tickets created, split, updated
Agent Delegation
Deep Exploration: Thoroughly explore the codebase to understand:
- Current implementation patterns and conventions
- Affected components and their dependencies
- Existing test coverage and testing patterns
Design Review: Have the architectural approach reviewed for scalability, maintainability, and alignment with existing patterns.
Codebase Analysis: Before proceeding, thoroughly explore the existing codebase to understand current patterns, architecture, and conventions.
Architecture Review: Have the proposed structure reviewed for completeness and proper organization.