Evaluations (v2 harness)
Internal evaluation harness for the AI Workflow Builder. Supports local CLI runs and LangSmith-backed runs, using the same evaluators.
Overview
Evaluations (v2 harness)
Internal evaluation harness for the AI Workflow Builder. Supports local CLI runs and LangSmith-backed runs, using the same evaluators.
Quick Start
Run from the package directory:
pushd packages/@n8n/ai-workflow-builder.ee
# Local: run against default prompts (fixtures/default-prompts.csv)
pnpm eval --verbose
# Local: single prompt
pnpm eval --prompt "Create a workflow that..." --verbose
# Local: custom CSV file
pnpm eval --prompts-csv path/to/prompts.csv --verbose
# Local: pairwise + programmatic
pnpm eval:pairwise --prompt "Create a workflow that..." --dos "Must use Slack" --donts "No HTTP Request node" --verbose
# LangSmith: LLM-judge + programmatic
pnpm eval:langsmith --dataset "workflow-builder-canvas-prompts" --name "my-exp" --concurrency 10 --max-examples 20 --verbose
# LangSmith: pairwise + programmatic
pnpm eval:pairwise:langsmith --dataset "notion-pairwise-workflows" --name "pairwise-exp" --filter "technique:content_generation" --max-examples 50 --verbose
popd
Prerequisites
- LLM key (required for generation and any LLM-based evaluators):
N8N_AI_ANTHROPIC_KEY(seeevaluations/support/environment.ts)
- Node definitions (required for workflow generation, and used by evaluators):
- export using
pnpm export:nodesin this package. evaluations/.data/nodes.json(seeevaluations/support/load-nodes.ts)- Optional:
N8N_EVALS_DISABLED_NODES="n8n-nodes-base.httpRequest,..."to exclude specific nodes from generation.
- export using
- LangSmith (only for
--backend langsmithruns):LANGSMITH_API_KEYLANGSMITH_TRACING=true(the harness sets this in LangSmith mode, but exporting it is fine)- Optional:
LANGSMITH_MINIMAL_TRACING=falseto disable trace filtering (useful when debugging traces; default is filtered)
Mental Model
flowchart TB
subgraph Config["runEvaluation(config)"]
direction LR
C1["mode: 'local' | 'langsmith'"]
C2["dataset: TestCase[] | string"]
C3["generateWorkflow: (prompt) => workflow"]
C4["evaluators: Evaluator[]"]
end
Config --> Loop
subgraph Loop["For each test case"]
G["1. generateWorkflow(prompt)"]
E["2. evaluateWithPlugins (parallel)"]
A["3. Aggregate feedback"]
G --> E --> A
end
Loop --> Evaluators
subgraph Evaluators["Evaluators (run in parallel)"]
direction LR
LLM["LLM-Judge"]
Pair["Pairwise"]
Prog["Programmatic"]
Bin["Binary-Checks"]
end
Evaluators --> Feedback
subgraph Feedback["Feedback[]"]
F1["evaluator: string"]
F2["metric: string"]
F3["score: 0-1"]
F4["kind: 'score' | 'metric' | 'detail'"]
F5["comment?: string"]
end
Key Concepts
Evaluator
A function that takes a workflow and returns feedback:
interface Evaluator {
name: string;
evaluate(workflow: SimpleWorkflow, ctx: TContext): Promise<Feedback[]>;
}
Evaluators are:
- Independent - no dependencies between evaluators
- Parallel - all evaluators run concurrently
- Error-tolerant - if one fails, others continue
Feedback
The universal output format from all evaluators:
interface Feedback {
evaluator: string; // e.g., "llm-judge", "pairwise"
metric: string; // e.g., "functionality", "judge1", "efficiency.nodeCountEfficiency"
score: number; // 0.0 to 1.0
comment?: string; // Optional explanation/violations
kind: 'score' | 'metric' | 'detail';
}
kind is used by the harness scoring logic:
score: the evaluator’s single overall score (preferred for scoring)metric: stable per-category metrics (useful to show, but not necessarily used for scoring if ascoreexists)detail: verbose/unstable metrics and details (never used for scoring when ascoreis present)
Lifecycle Hooks
Centralized logging via hooks (not per-evaluator logging):
interface EvaluationLifecycle {
onStart(config): void;
onExampleStart(index, total, prompt): void;
onWorkflowGenerated(workflow, durationMs): void;
onEvaluatorComplete(name, feedback): void;
onEvaluatorError(name, error): void;
onExampleComplete(index, result): void;
onEnd(summary): void;
}
Context
Evaluators receive context from multiple sources:
globalContext (from RunConfig.context)
+
testCase.context (per-test-case overrides)
+
prompt (always included)
=
Final context passed to evaluators
Local vs LangSmith Mode
Local Mode
const logger = createLogger(true); // verbose output
const config: RunConfig = {
mode: 'local',
dataset: [
{ prompt: 'Create a workflow...', context: { dos: '...' } },
],
generateWorkflow,
evaluators: [llmJudge, programmatic],
lifecycle: createConsoleLifecycle({ verbose: true, logger }),
logger,
};
await runEvaluation(config);
- Processes test cases sequentially (examples), but LLM-bound work is capped via
llmCallLimiter(seeevaluations/harness/runner.ts) - Results logged to console via lifecycle hooks
- The harness returns a
RunSummary; the CLI decides exit codes
LangSmith Mode
const logger = createLogger(false); // non-verbose output
const config: RunConfig = {
mode: 'langsmith',
dataset: 'my-dataset-name', // LangSmith dataset
generateWorkflow,
evaluators: [llmJudge, programmatic],
logger,
langsmithOptions: {
experimentName: 'experiment-1',
repetitions: 1,
concurrency: 4,
},
};
await runEvaluation(config);
If you want no output (e.g. unit tests), use createQuietLifecycle() (or pass a stub logger) instead of relying on a "silent logger".
Architecture: The target function does ALL work (generation + evaluation). The LangSmith evaluator just extracts pre-computed feedback. The runner flushes pending trace batches before returning, so traces/results reliably show up in LangSmith.
// Inside runLangsmith():
// IMPORTANT: Create traceable wrapper ONCE outside the target function
// to avoid context leaking in concurrent scenarios. Pass params explicitly.
const traceableGenerateWorkflow = traceable(
async (args: { prompt: string; genFn: Function }) => {
return await args.genFn(args.prompt);
},
{ name: 'workflow_generation', run_type: 'chain', client: lsClient }
);
const target = async (inputs) => {
const { prompt } = inputs;
// Call the pre-created wrapper with explicit params (no closures)
const workflow = await traceableGenerateWorkflow({
prompt,
genFn: generateWorkflow,
});
const feedback = await evaluateWithPlugins(workflow, evaluators);
return { workflow, prompt, feedback }; // Pre-computed!
};
// LangSmith evaluator converts internal `{ evaluator, metric }` into `{ key, score, comment? }`:
const feedbackExtractor = (run) => run.outputs.feedback.map(toLangsmithEvaluationResult);
LangSmith Tracing
- Do not wrap the
targetfunction withtraceable()—evaluate()handles that automatically - Do create
traceablewrappers once outside the target function (not inside concurrent code) - Do pass all parameters explicitly to avoid closure-based context leaking
- Do use
getTracingCallbacks()to bridge traceable context to LangChain calls (pass callbacks toagent.chat()or chain'sinvoke())
Available Evaluators
LLM-Judge
Uses an LLM to evaluate workflow quality across multiple dimensions:
const evaluator = createLLMJudgeEvaluator(llm, nodeTypes);
Evaluator: llm-judge
Metrics: functionality, connections, expressions, nodeConfiguration, efficiency, dataFlow, maintainability, overallScore
Context required: { prompt: string }
Pairwise
Uses a panel of judges to evaluate against dos/donts criteria:
const evaluator = createPairwiseEvaluator(llm, { numJudges: 3 });
Evaluator: pairwise
Metrics:
pairwise_primary, pairwise_diagnostic, pairwise_judges_passed, pairwise_total_passes, pairwise_total_violations
Additional per-judge details may also be emitted (e.g. judge1, judge2).
Context required: { dos?: string, donts?: string }
Binary-Checks
Per-check binary pass/fail evaluation — 17 deterministic checks (fast, no LLM) plus 5 LLM-judge checks (parallel):
const evaluator = createBinaryChecksEvaluator({ nodeTypes, llm });
Evaluator: binary-checks
Deterministic checks: has_nodes, all_nodes_connected, no_unreachable_nodes, has_trigger, no_empty_set_nodes, agent_has_dynamic_prompt, agent_has_language_model, memory_properly_connected, vector_store_has_embeddings, has_start_node, no_hardcoded_credentials, no_unnecessary_code_nodes, expressions_reference_existing_nodes, valid_required_parameters, valid_options_values, no_invalid_from_ai, tools_have_parameters
LLM checks (require llm option): fulfills_user_request, correct_node_operations, valid_data_flow, handles_multiple_items, descriptive_node_names
Context required: { prompt: string }, optional { annotations?: Record<string, unknown> }
CLI:
# Run all checks
pnpm eval --suite binary-checks --prompt "Create a Slack workflow"
# Run specific checks only
pnpm eval --suite binary-checks --checks has_nodes,has_trigger --prompt "..."
# LangSmith
pnpm eval --suite binary-checks --langsmith --dataset "binary-checks-spec-prompts"
Programmatic
Rule-based checks without LLM calls:
const evaluator = createProgrammaticEvaluator(nodeTypes);
Evaluator: programmatic
Metrics: overall, connections, trigger, agentPrompt, tools, fromAi (optional: similarity)
Context required: None
Metric Naming (LangSmith compatibility)
LangSmith metric keys are derived from Feedback in evaluations/harness/feedback.ts:
llm-judge: unprefixed (e.g.overallScore,maintainability.workflowOrganization)programmatic: prefixed (e.g.programmatic.trigger)pairwise: v1-compatible keys stay unprefixed (e.g.pairwise_primary); non-v1 details are namespaced (e.g.pairwise.judge1)
CLI Usage
NPM Scripts
# Local mode with LLM-judge evaluator
pnpm eval --prompt "Create a workflow..." --verbose
# LangSmith mode (results in LangSmith dashboard)
pnpm eval:langsmith --name "my-experiment" --verbose
# Pairwise mode (local)
pnpm eval:pairwise --prompt "..." --dos "Must use Slack" --donts "No HTTP"
# Pairwise mode with LangSmith
pnpm eval:pairwise:langsmith --name "pairwise-exp" --verbose
Notes:
- In
--backend langsmithmode, the CLI requires--datasetand rejects--prompt,--prompts-csv, and--test-case. --output-dironly applies to local mode (it writes artifacts to disk).
Common Flags
--suite <llm-judge|pairwise|programmatic|similarity|binary-checks>
--backend <local|langsmith> # Or `--langsmith` as a shortcut
--verbose, -v # Enable verbose output
--name <name> # Experiment name (LangSmith mode)
--dataset <name> # LangSmith dataset name
--max-examples <n> # Limit number of examples to evaluate
--concurrency <n> # Max concurrent evaluations (default: 5)
--repetitions <n> # Number of repetitions per example
--test-case <id> # Run a predefined test case (local)
--prompts-csv <path># Load prompts from CSV (local)
--prompt <text> # Single prompt for local testing
--dos <text> # Pairwise: things the workflow should do
--donts <text> # Pairwise: things the workflow should not do
--checks <names> # Comma-separated binary check names (binary-checks suite only)
--output-dir <dir> # Local mode: write artifacts (one folder per example + summary.json)
--template-examples # Enable template examples feature flag
--webhook-url <url> # Send results to webhook URL on completion (HTTPS only)
--webhook-secret <s> # HMAC-SHA256 secret for webhook authentication (min 16 chars)
CSV Format
--prompts-csv supports optional headers. Recognized columns:
prompt(required)id(optional)dos/do(optional)donts/dont(optional)
Example:
id,prompt,dos,donts
pw-001,"Create a workflow to sync Gmail to Notion","Must use Notion","No HTTP Request node"
Direct Usage
# Local mode (default)
tsx evaluations/cli/index.ts --prompt "Create a workflow..." --verbose
# LangSmith mode
tsx evaluations/cli/index.ts --backend langsmith --name "my-experiment" --verbose
# Pairwise mode
tsx evaluations/cli/index.ts --suite pairwise --prompt "..." --dos "Must use Slack"
Components & Where Things Live
This directory is intentionally split by responsibility:
evaluations/cli/: CLI entrypoint and input parsing (cli/index.ts,cli/argument-parser.ts,cli/csv-prompt-loader.ts,cli/webhook.ts)evaluations/harness/: orchestration, scoring, logging, and artifact writing (harness/runner.ts,harness/lifecycle.ts,harness/score-calculator.ts,harness/output.ts)evaluations/evaluators/: evaluator factories used by the harness (LLM-judge, pairwise, programmatic, similarity, binary-checks)evaluations/judge/: the LLM-judge “engine” (schemas + category evaluators +judge/workflow-evaluator.ts)evaluations/langsmith/: LangSmith-specific helpers (langsmith/trace-filters.ts,langsmith/types.ts)evaluations/support/: environment setup, node loading, report generation, and test-case generationevaluations/programmatic/: programmatic evaluator implementation (TypeScript) +programmatic/python/(kept separate)
Extending
Adding a new evaluator
Add an evaluator by implementing the Evaluator interface and returning Feedback[]:
- Put evaluator factories under
evaluations/evaluators/<name>/ - Make sure you emit at least one
kind: 'score'item (the harness scoring prefers this) - If you need custom context, extend via
Evaluatorand validate required fields at runtime (keep the base context cast-free) - If you want stable LangSmith keys, update
evaluations/harness/feedback.ts
Adding a new “runner” (backend)
The harness runner is evaluations/harness/runner.ts. Today it supports:
mode: 'local'(local dataset array + optional artifacts)mode: 'langsmith'(LangSmith dataset or preloaded examples)
To add a new backend, keep evaluators backend-agnostic and extend the runner with a new RunConfig['mode'] branch.
File Structure
evaluations/
├── __tests__/