Makefile Generator
Generate production-ready Makefiles with best practices for C/C++, Python, Go, Java, and generic projects. Features GNU Coding Standards compliance, standard targets, security hardening, and automatic validation via devops-skills:makefile-validator skill.
Overview
Makefile Generator
Overview
Generate production-ready Makefiles with best practices for C/C++, Python, Go, Java, and generic projects. Features GNU Coding Standards compliance, standard targets, security hardening, and automatic validation via devops-skills:makefile-validator skill.
When to Use
- Creating new Makefiles from scratch
- Setting up build systems for projects (C/C++, Python, Go, Java)
- Implementing build automation and CI/CD integration
- Converting manual build processes to Makefiles
- The user asks to "create", "generate", or "write" a Makefile
Do NOT use for: Validating existing Makefiles (use devops-skills:makefile-validator), debugging (use make -d), or running builds.
Trigger Phrases
Use this skill when prompts look like:
- "Generate a Makefile for a Go service"
- "Create a production Makefile with install/test/help targets"
- "Write a Makefile for a C project with dependency tracking"
- "Add standard GNU targets to this existing Makefile"
Generation Workflow
Stage 1: Gather Requirements
Collect information for the following categories. Use AskUserQuestion when information is missing or ambiguous:
| Category | Information Needed |
|---|---|
| Project | Language (C/C++/Python/Go/Java), structure (single/multi-directory) |
| Build | Source files, output artifacts, dependencies, build order |
| Install | PREFIX location, directories (bin/lib/share), files to install |
| Targets | all, install, clean, test, dist, help (which are needed?) |
| Config | Compiler, flags, pkg-config dependencies, cross-compilation |
When to Use AskUserQuestion (MUST ask if any apply):
| Condition | Example Question |
|---|---|
| Language not specified | "What programming language is this project? (C/C++/Go/Python/Java)" |
| Project structure unclear | "Is this a single-directory or multi-directory project?" |
| Docker requested but registry unknown | "Which container registry should be used? (docker.io/ghcr.io/custom)" |
| Multiple binaries possible | "Should this build a single binary or multiple executables?" |
| Install targets needed but paths unclear | "Where should binaries be installed? (default: /usr/local/bin)" |
| Cross-compilation mentioned | "What is the target platform/architecture?" |
When to Skip AskUserQuestion (proceed with defaults):
- User explicitly provides all required information
- Standard project type with obvious defaults (e.g., "Go project with Docker" → use standard Go+Docker patterns)
- User says "use defaults" or "standard setup"
Default Assumptions (when not asking):
- Single-directory project structure
- PREFIX=/usr/local
- Standard targets: all, build, test, clean, install, help
- No cross-compilation
Stage 2: Documentation Lookup
When REQUIRED (MUST perform lookup):
- User requests integration with unfamiliar tools, frameworks, or build systems
- Complex build patterns not covered in Stage 3 examples (e.g., Bazel, Meson, custom toolchains)
- Docker/container integration (Dockerfile builds, multi-stage, registry push)
- CI/CD platform-specific integration (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins)
- Cross-compilation for unusual targets or embedded systems
- Package manager integration (Conan, vcpkg, Homebrew formulas)
- Multi-binary or multi-library projects
- Version embedding via ldflags or build-time variables
When OPTIONAL (may skip external lookup):
- Standard language patterns already covered in Stage 3 (C/C++, Go, Python, Java)
- Simple single-binary projects with no external dependencies
- User provides complete requirements with no ambiguity
- Internal docs already cover the required pattern comprehensively
Lookup Process (follow in order):
-
ALWAYS consult internal docs first using explicit file-open commands (primary source of truth):
Full doc path map (prefer full paths for deterministic access):
Doc Full Path Structure guide devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/makefile-structure.mdVariables guide devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/variables-guide.mdTargets guide devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/targets-guide.mdPatterns guide devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/patterns-guide.mdOptimization guide devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/optimization-guide.mdSecurity guide devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/security-guide.mdRequirement Read This Doc Docker/container targets .../docs/patterns-guide.md(Pattern 8: Docker Integration)Multi-binary projects .../docs/patterns-guide.md(Pattern 7: Multi-Binary Project)Go projects with version embedding .../docs/patterns-guide.md(Pattern 5: Go Project)Parallel builds, caching, ccache .../docs/optimization-guide.mdCredentials, secrets, API keys .../docs/security-guide.mdComplex dependencies, pattern rules .../docs/patterns-guide.mdOrder-only prerequisites .../docs/optimization-guide.mdor.../docs/targets-guide.mdVariables, assignment operators .../docs/variables-guide.mdDeterministic open/read commands:
# From repository root: sed -n '1,220p' devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/patterns-guide.md rg -n "Pattern 5|Pattern 8" devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/patterns-guide.md # From skill directory: sed -n '1,220p' docs/security-guide.mdIf shell commands are unavailable, use the environment's file-open/read capability on the same paths.
Required Workflow Example (Docker + Go with version embedding):
# Step 1: Read Go pattern rg -n "Pattern 5" devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/patterns-guide.md # Step 2: Read Docker pattern rg -n "Pattern 8" devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/patterns-guide.md # Step 3: Read security guidance sed -n '1,220p' devops-skills-plugin/skills/makefile-generator/docs/security-guide.mdThen generate Makefile and list consulted docs in a header comment.
-
Try context7 for external tool documentation (when internal docs don't cover a specific tool):
# Only needed for tools/frameworks NOT covered in internal docs mcp__context7__resolve-library-id: "<tool-name>" mcp__context7__query-docs: query="<integration-topic>" # Example queries: # - For Docker: query="dockerfile best practices" # - For Go: query="go build ldflags" # - For specific tools: query="<tool> makefile integration"Fallback: If context7 is unavailable or returns nothing useful, record that and continue to Step 3.
-
Fallback to WebSearch (only if pattern not found in internal docs OR context7):
"<specific-feature>" makefile best practices 2025 Example: "docker makefile best practices 2025" Example: "go ldflags version makefile 2025"Trigger WebSearch when: Internal docs don't cover the specific integration AND context7 returns no relevant results.
Note: Document which internal docs you consulted in your response (add comment in generated Makefile header).
Stage 3: Generate Makefile
Optional helper-script fast path (for standard layouts):
# Generate template: TYPE NAME OUTPUT
bash scripts/generate_makefile_template.sh go myservice Makefile
# Add only selected standard targets
bash scripts/add_standard_targets.sh Makefile install clean help
Use manual authoring when requirements are complex (Docker release flow, multi-binary matrices, custom toolchains).
Header (choose one style)
Traditional (POSIX-compatible):
.DELETE_ON_ERROR:
.SUFFIXES:
Modern (GNU Make 4.0+, recommended):
SHELL := bash
.ONESHELL:
.SHELLFLAGS := -eu -o pipefail -c
.DELETE_ON_ERROR:
.SUFFIXES:
MAKEFLAGS += --warn-undefined-variables
MAKEFLAGS += --no-builtin-rules
Standard Variables
# User-overridable (use ?=)
CC ?= gcc
CFLAGS ?= -Wall -Wextra -O2
PREFIX ?= /usr/local
DESTDIR ?=
# GNU installation directories
BINDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/bin
LIBDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/lib
INCLUDEDIR ?= $(PREFIX)/include
# Project-specific (use :=)
PROJECT := myproject
VERSION := 1.0.0
SRCDIR := src
BUILDDIR := build
SOURCES := $(wildcard $(SRCDIR)/*.c)
OBJECTS := $(SOURCES:$(SRCDIR)/%.c=$(BUILDDIR)/%.o)
Language-Specific Build Rules
C/C++:
$(TARGET): $(OBJECTS)
$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $^ $(LDLIBS) -o $@
$(BUILDDIR)/%.o: $(SRCDIR)/%.c
@mkdir -p $(@D)
$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) -MMD -MP -c $< -o $@
-include $(OBJECTS:.o=.d)
Go:
$(TARGET): $(shell find . -name '*.go') go.mod
go build -o $@ ./cmd/$(PROJECT)
Python:
.PHONY: build
build:
python -m build
.PHONY: develop
develop:
pip install -e .[dev]
Java:
$(BUILDDIR)/%.class: $(SRCDIR)/%.java
@mkdir -p $(@D)
javac -d $(BUILDDIR) -sourcepath $(SRCDIR) $<
Standard Targets
.PHONY: all clean install uninstall test help
## Build all targets
all: $(TARGET)
## Install to PREFIX
install: all
install -d $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)
install -m 755 $(TARGET) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)/
## Remove built files
clean:
$(RM) -r $(BUILDDIR) $(TARGET)
## Run tests
test:
# Add test commands
## Show help
help:
@echo "$(PROJECT) v$(VERSION)"
@echo "Targets: all, install, clean, test, help"
@echo "Override: make CC=clang PREFIX=/opt"
Stage 4: Validate and Format
Validation is required for every generated Makefile.
Validation Tool Preflight (default + fallback)
- Preferred path: run
devops-skills:makefile-validator. - If validator skill is unavailable: run local fallback checks:
# Required fallback check (if make exists) make -f -n --dry-run # Structural fallback checks rg -n '^ {1,}\\S' # suspicious space-indented recipe lines rg -n '^\\.PHONY:' - If
makeis unavailable: run structural checks only, report "partial validation due to missing make binary", and request user confirmation before claiming production readiness.
Required Validation Loop
1. Generate Makefile following stages above
2. Run validator skill (or fallback checks if unavailable)
3. Fix all errors (MUST have 0 errors before completion)
4. Apply formatting fixes (see "Formatting Step" below)
5. Fix warnings when feasible (SHOULD fix; explain if skipped)
6. Address info items for large/production projects
7. Re-run validation until checks pass
8. Output structured validation report (REQUIRED - see format below)
Formatting Step (REQUIRED)
When mbake reports formatting issues, you MUST either:
-
Auto-apply formatting (preferred for minor issues):
mbake format -
Explain why not applied (if formatting would break functionality):
Formatting not applied because: - [specific reason, e.g., "heredoc syntax would be corrupted"] - Manual review recommended for: [specific lines]
If mbake is not installed or not executable, skip formatter execution and record:
Formatting skipped: mbake unavailable in current environment.
Formatting Decision Guide:
| mbake Report | Action |
|---|---|
| "Would reformat" with no specific issues | Auto-apply with mbake format |
| Specific whitespace/indentation issues | Auto-apply with mbake format |
| Issues in complex heredocs or multi-line strings | Skip formatting, explain in output |
Issues in # bake-format off sections | Skip (intentionally disabled) |
mbake command unavailable | Skip formatting, record tool-unavailable reason |
Validation Pass Criteria:
| Level | Requirement | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Errors (0 required) | Syntax errors, missing tabs, invalid targets | MUST fix before completion |
| Warnings (fix if feasible) | Formatting issues, missing optimizations | SHOULD fix; explain if skipped |
| Info (address for production) | Enhancement suggestions, style preferences | SHOULD address for production Makefiles |
Known mbake False Positives (can be safely ignored):
The mbake validator may report warnings for valid GNU Make special targets. These are false positives and can be ignored:
| mbake Warning | Actual Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| "Unknown special target '.DELETE_ON_ERROR'" | ✅ Valid | Critical GNU Make target that deletes failed build artifacts |
| "Unknown special target '.SUFFIXES'" | ✅ Valid | Standard GNU Make target for disabling/setting suffix rules |
| "Unknown special target '.ONESHELL'" | ✅ Valid | GNU Make 3.82+ feature for single-shell recipe execution |
| "Unknown special target '.POSIX'" | ✅ Valid | POSIX compliance declaration |
Validation Report Output (REQUIRED)
After validation completes, you MUST output a structured report in the following format. This is not optional.
Required Report Format:
## Validation Report
**Result:** [PASSED / PASSED with warnings / FAILED]
**Errors:** [count]
**Warnings:** [count]
**Info:** [count]
### Errors Fixed
- [List each error and how it was fixed, or "None" if 0 errors]
### Warnings Addressed
- [List each warning that was fixed]
### Warnings Skipped (with reasons)
- [List each warning that was NOT fixed and explain why]
- Example: "mbake reports '.DELETE_ON_ERROR' as unknown - this is a valid GNU Make
special target (false positive)"
### Formatting Applied
- [Yes/No] - [If No, explain why formatting was skipped]
### Info Items Addressed
- [List info items that were addressed for production Makefiles]
- [Or "N/A - simple project" if not applicable]
### Remaining Issues (if any)
- [List any issues requiring user attention]
- [Or "None - Makefile is production-ready"]
Example Complete Report:
## Validation Report
**Result:** PASSED with warnings
**Errors:** 0
**Warnings:** 2
**Info:** 1
### Errors Fixed
- None
### Warnings Addressed
- Fixed: Added error handling to install target (|| exit 1)
### Warnings Skipped (with reasons)
- mbake reports ".DELETE_ON_ERROR" as unknown - this is a valid and critical
GNU Make special target that ensures failed builds don't leave corrupt files.
See: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Special-Targets.html
### Formatting Applied
- Yes - Applied `mbake format` to fix whitespace issues
### Info Items Addressed
- Added .NOTPARALLEL for Docker targets (parallel safety)
- Added error handling for docker-push target
### Remaining Issues
- None - Makefile is