Scientific Writing
**This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool**—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.
Overview
Scientific Writing
Overview
This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.
Scientific writing is a process for communicating research with precision and clarity. Write manuscripts using IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, and reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA). Apply this skill for research papers and journal submissions.
Critical Principle: Always write in full paragraphs with flowing prose. Never submit bullet points in the final manuscript. Use a two-stage process: first create section outlines with key points using research-lookup, then convert those outlines into complete paragraphs.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Writing or revising any section of a scientific manuscript (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion)
- Structuring a research paper using IMRAD or other standard formats
- Formatting citations and references in specific styles (APA, AMA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE)
- Creating, formatting, or improving figures, tables, and data visualizations
- Applying study-specific reporting guidelines (CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for reviews)
- Drafting abstracts that meet journal requirements (structured or unstructured)
- Preparing manuscripts for submission to specific journals
- Improving writing clarity, conciseness, and precision
- Ensuring proper use of field-specific terminology and nomenclature
- Addressing reviewer comments and revising manuscripts
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
⚠️ MANDATORY: Every scientific paper MUST include a graphical abstract plus 1-2 additional AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.
This is not optional. Scientific papers without visual elements are incomplete. Before finalizing any document:
- ALWAYS generate a graphical abstract as the first visual element
- Generate at minimum ONE additional schematic or diagram using scientific-schematics
- Prefer 3-4 total figures for comprehensive papers (graphical abstract + methods flowchart + results visualization + conceptual diagram)
Graphical Abstract (REQUIRED)
Every scientific writeup MUST include a graphical abstract. This is a visual summary of your paper that:
- Appears before or immediately after the text abstract
- Captures the entire paper's key message in one image
- Is suitable for journal table of contents display
- Uses landscape orientation (typically 1200x600px)
Generate the graphical abstract FIRST:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Graphical abstract for [paper title]: [brief description showing workflow from input → methods → key findings → conclusions]" -o figures/graphical_abstract.png
Graphical Abstract Requirements:
- Content: Visual summary showing workflow, key methods, main findings, and conclusions
- Style: Clean, professional, suitable for journal TOC
- Elements: Include 3-5 key steps/concepts with connecting arrows or flow
- Text: Minimal labels, large readable fonts
- Log:
[HH:MM:SS] GENERATED: Graphical abstract for paper summary
Additional Figures (GENERATE EXTENSIVELY)
⚠️ CRITICAL: Use BOTH scientific-schematics AND generate-image EXTENSIVELY throughout all documents.
Every document should be richly illustrated. Generate figures liberally - when in doubt, add a visual.
MINIMUM Figure Requirements:
| Document Type | Minimum | Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Research Papers | 5 | 6-8 |
| Literature Reviews | 4 | 5-7 |
| Market Research | 20 | 25-30 |
| Presentations | 1/slide | 1-2/slide |
| Posters | 6 | 8-10 |
| Grants | 4 | 5-7 |
| Clinical Reports | 3 | 4-6 |
Use scientific-schematics EXTENSIVELY for technical diagrams:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
- Study design and methodology flowcharts (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE)
- Conceptual framework diagrams
- Experimental workflow illustrations
- Data analysis pipeline diagrams
- Biological pathway or mechanism diagrams
- System architecture visualizations
- Neural network architectures
- Decision trees, algorithm flowcharts
- Comparison matrices, timeline diagrams
- Any technical concept that benefits from schematic visualization
Use generate-image EXTENSIVELY for visual content:
python scripts/generate_image.py "your image description" -o figures/output.png
- Photorealistic illustrations of concepts
- Medical/anatomical illustrations
- Environmental/ecological scenes
- Equipment and lab setup visualizations
- Artistic visualizations, infographics
- Cover images, header graphics
- Product mockups, prototype visualizations
- Any visual that enhances understanding or engagement
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When in Doubt, Generate a Figure:
- Complex concept → generate a schematic
- Data discussion → generate a visualization
- Process description → generate a flowchart
- Comparison → generate a comparison diagram
- Reader benefit → generate a visual
For detailed guidance, refer to the scientific-schematics and generate-image skill documentation.
Core Capabilities
1. Manuscript Structure and Organization
IMRAD Format: Guide papers through the standard Introduction, Methods, Results, And Discussion structure used across most scientific disciplines. This includes:
- Introduction: Establish research context, identify gaps, state objectives
- Methods: Detail study design, populations, procedures, and analysis approaches
- Results: Present findings objectively without interpretation
- Discussion: Interpret results, acknowledge limitations, propose future directions
For detailed guidance on IMRAD structure, refer to references/imrad_structure.md.
Alternative Structures: Support discipline-specific formats including:
- Review articles (narrative, systematic, scoping)
- Case reports and case series
- Meta-analyses and pooled analyses
- Theoretical/modeling papers
- Methods papers and protocols
2. Section-Specific Writing Guidance
Abstract Composition: Craft concise, standalone summaries (100-250 words) that capture the paper's purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Support both structured abstracts (with labeled sections) and unstructured single-paragraph formats.
Introduction Development: Build compelling introductions that:
- Establish the research problem's importance
- Review relevant literature systematically
- Identify knowledge gaps or controversies
- State clear research questions or hypotheses
- Explain the study's novelty and significance
Methods Documentation: Ensure reproducibility through:
- Detailed participant/sample descriptions
- Clear procedural documentation
- Statistical methods with justification
- Equipment and materials specifications
- Ethical approval and consent statements
Results Presentation: Present findings with:
- Logical flow from primary to secondary outcomes
- Integration with figures and tables
- Statistical significance with effect sizes
- Objective reporting without interpretation
Discussion Construction: Synthesize findings by:
- Relating results to research questions
- Comparing with existing literature
- Acknowledging limitations honestly
- Proposing mechanistic explanations
- Suggesting practical implications and future research
3. Citation and Reference Management
Apply citation styles correctly across disciplines. For comprehensive style guides, refer to references/citation_styles.md.
Major Citation Styles:
- AMA (American Medical Association): Numbered superscript citations, common in medicine
- Vancouver: Numbered citations in square brackets, biomedical standard
- APA (American Psychological Association): Author-date in-text citations, common in social sciences
- Chicago: Notes-bibliography or author-date, humanities and sciences
- IEEE: Numbered square brackets, engineering and computer science
Best Practices:
- Cite primary sources when possible
- Include recent literature (last 5-10 years for active fields)
- Balance citation distribution across introduction and discussion
- Verify all citations against original sources
- Use reference management software (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)
4. Figures and Tables
Create effective data visualizations that enhance comprehension. For detailed best practices, refer to references/figures_tables.md.
When to Use Tables vs. Figures:
- Tables: Precise numerical data, complex datasets, multiple variables requiring exact values
- Figures: Trends, patterns, relationships, comparisons best understood visually
Design Principles:
- Make each table/figure self-explanatory with complete captions
- Use consistent formatting and terminology across all display items
- Label all axes, columns, and rows with units
- Include sample sizes (n) and statistical annotations
- Follow the "one table/figure per 1000 words" guideline
- Avoid duplicating information between text, tables, and figures
Common Figure Types:
- Bar graphs: Comparing discrete categories
- Line graphs: Showing trends over time
- Scatterplots: Displaying correlations
- Box plots: Showing distributions and outliers
- Heatmaps: Visualizing matrices and patterns
5. Reporting Guidelines by Study Type
Ensure completeness and transparency by following established reporting standards. For comprehensive guideline details, refer to references/reporting_guidelines.md.
Key Guidelines:
- CONSORT: Randomized controlled trials
- STROBE: Observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional)
- PRISMA: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- STARD: Diagnostic accuracy studies
- TRIPOD: Prediction model studies
- ARRIVE: Animal research
- CARE: Case reports
- SQUIRE: Quality improvement studies
- SPIRIT: Study protocols for clinical trials
- CHEERS: Economic evaluations
Each guideline provides checklists ensuring all critical methodological elements are reported.
6. Writing Principles and Style
Apply fundamental scientific writing principles. For detailed guidance, refer to references/writing_principles.md.
Clarity:
- Use precise, unambiguous language
- Define technical terms and abbreviations at first use
- Maintain logical flow within and between paragraphs
- Use active voice when appropriate for clarity
Conciseness:
- Eliminate redundant words and phrases
- Favor shorter sentences (15-20 words average)
- Remove unnecessary qualifiers
- Respect word limits strictly
Accuracy:
- Report exact values with appropriate precision
- Use consistent terminology throughout
- Distinguish between observations and interpretations
- Acknowledge uncertainty appropriately
Objectivity:
- Present results without bias
- Avoid overstating findings or implications
- Acknowledge conflicting evidence
- Maintain professional, neutral tone
7. Writing Process: From Outline to Full Paragraphs
CRITICAL: Always write in full paragraphs, never submit bullet points in scientific papers.
Scientific papers must be written in complete, flowing prose. Use this two-stage approach for effective writing:
Stage 1: Create Section Outlines with Key Points
When starting a new section:
- Use the research-lookup skill to gather relevant literature and data
- Create a structured outline with bullet points marking:
- Main arguments or findings to present
- Key studies to cite
- Data points and statistics to include
- Logical flow and organization
- These bullet points serve as scaffolding—they are NOT the final manuscript
Example outline (Introduction section):
- Background: AI in drug discovery gaining traction
* Cite recent reviews (Smith 2023, Jones 2024)
* Traditional methods are slow and expensive
- Gap: Limited application to rare diseases
* Only 2 prior studies (Lee 2022, Chen 2023)
* Small datasets remain a challenge
- Our approach: Transfer learning from common diseases
* Novel architecture combining X and Y
- Study objectives: Validate on 3 rare disease datasets
Stage 2: Convert Key Points to Full Paragraphs
Once the outline is complete, expand each bullet point into proper prose:
- Transform bullet points into complete sentences with subjects, verbs, and objects
- Add transitions between sentences and ideas (however, moreover, in contrast, subsequently)
- Integrate citations naturally within sentences, not as lists
- Expand with context and explanation that bullet points omit
- Ensure logical flow from one sentence to the next within each paragraph
- Vary sentence structure to maintain reader engagement
Example conversion to prose:
Artificial intelligence approaches have gained significant traction in drug discovery
pipelines over the past decade (Smith, 2023; Jones, 2024). While these computational
methods show promise for accelerating the identification of therapeutic candidates,
traditional experimental approaches remain slow and resource-intensive, often requiring
years of laboratory work and substantial financial investment. However, the application
of AI to rare diseases has been limited, with only two prior studies demonstrating
proof-of-concept results (Lee, 2022; Chen, 2023). The primary obstacle has been the
scarcity of training data for conditions affecting small patient populations.
To address this challenge, we developed a transfer learning approach that leverages
knowledge from well-characterized common diseases to predict therapeutic targets for
rare conditions. Our novel neural architecture combines convolutional layers for
molecular feature extraction with attention mechanisms for protein-ligand interaction
modeling. The objective of this study was to validate our approach across three
independent rare disease datasets, assessing both predictive accuracy and biological
interpretability of the results.
**Key